Patočka and Diotima. Notes for a dialogue on the beautiful

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi46.6680

Keywords:

Negative Platonism, Jan Patočka, Diotima, experience, freedom, eros, beauty, virtue

Abstract

Negative Platonism is perhaps one of Jan Patočka's texts that has received the most attention in the academic world. Its importance is rarely doubted. However, today we are far from exhausting the implications of the Czech philosopher's interpretation of Plato. In particular, the conception of the Platonic Idea that derives from Patočka's reading does not seem to have been sufficiently confronted with what Plato himself said in his dialogues. According to the author, there seems to be a particular affinity between what Diotima says in her speech in the Symposium and Patočka's interpretation of Plato, which, until now, does not seem to have received enough attention in the academic literature on these two authors. In a similar way to what Patočka proposes with the experience of freedom as a door that opens to the consideration of the Idea, Diotima anchors the recognition of beauty in itself with the experience of beauty in the world. This "anchoring" would be given by the ascending path proposed in the scala amoris, in which eros, assumes an “integrative function” within the lover. Precisely, this integrative function carried out by eros seems to give reason to the link that Diotima establishes between that which is beauty in itself and the true virtue that the lover engenders by experiencing it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carlos Contreras Medina, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello

Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.

Caracas. Venezuela.

Mechanical Engineer from the Central University of Venezuela (2011), Master in Philosophy from the Andrés Bello Catholic University (2022) and doctoral student in Philosophy from the same study house.

Currently, he is a research professor at the Communication and Information Research Institute (IDICI) and an associate researcher at the Center for Humanistic Research and Training (CIFH), both centers belonging to the Andrés Bello Catholic University. He is a professor of the subject Introduction to Philosophy at the Faculty of Legal and Political Sciences of the Monteávila University, as well as of Fundamentals of the Modern World at the Faculty of Communication and Information Sciences. Likewise, he is part of the coordinating team of the Advanced Studies Program in Digital Humanities at the Andrés Bello Catholic University.

His fields of research have to do with Contemporary Philosophy and Communication Theories, with a particular emphasis on topics related to aesthetics, technology and media theory. Currently, her doctoral research project consists of an analysis of the relationship between beauty and virtue in Diotima's speech at the Symposium, taking into account the considerations of the interpretation of Plato made by Jan Patočka in his text Negative Platonism.

References

Arendt, Hannah. The Promise of Politics, (New York: Schocken Books, 2009).

Arnason, Johann P., “Platonism: Jan Patočka’s Critique and Recovery of Metaphysics”, Thesis Eleven, Number 90, August (2007).

Contreras Medina, Carlos. “La revelación de Diotima de Mantinea. Sobre el vínculo entre belleza y virtud en el discurso de Sócrates en el Banquete, de Platón” (Tesis de maestría: Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, 2022).

Desmond, William. God and the Between (Malden: Blackwell, 2008).

Evink, Eddo “The Relevance of Patočka’s ‘Negative Platonism’” en Ivan Chvatík & Erika Abrahams, Jan Patočka and the Heritage of Phenomenology: Centenary Papers (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011).

Hyland, Drew A. Plato and the question of Beauty (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008).

Koci, Martin. Thinking Faith after Christianity. A Theological Reading of Jan Patočka’s Phenomenological Philosophy (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2020).

Kohák, Erazim; Patočka, Jan. Philosohpy and Selected Writings (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).

Patočka, Jan Sebrané spisy, 1: Pécˇe o duˇsi, I [Collected Works, Vol. 1: Care of the Soul, Part I] (Praha: Oikumene, 1996a).

Patočka, Jan. “Time, Myth, Faith” en: Ludger Hagedorn & James Dodd, The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy XIV. Religion, War and the Crisis of Modernity: A Special Issue Dedicated to the Philosophy of Jan Patočka (London: Routledge, 2015).

Platón. Diálogos IV. República. (Madrid: Gredos, 1988).

Platón. Diálogos VI. Filebo, Timeo, Critias. (Madrid: Gredos, 1988).

Platón. Diálogos. III. Fedón, Banquete, Fedro. (Madrid: Gredos, 1988).

Rezek, Petr.; Patočka, Jan. a věc fenomenologie (Praha: Oikoymenh, 1993).

Robin, Léon. La théorie platonicienne de l’amour (Paris : Felix Alcan, 1908).

Rosen, Stanley. Plato’s Symposium (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968).

Silverman, Allan. The Dialectic of Essence: A Study of Plato’s Metaphysics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).

Tava, Francesco; Patočka, Jan. Platonismo negativo e altri frammenti (Milano: Bompiani, 2015).

Ullman, Tamás. Negative Platonism and the Appearance-Problem en Ivan Chvatík & Erika Abrahams (eds.), Jan Patočka and the Heritage of Phenomenology: Centenary Papers (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011).

Voegelin, Eric. Order and History: Plato and Aristotle, Volume III, (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2000).

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Contreras Medina, C. (2024). Patočka and Diotima. Notes for a dialogue on the beautiful. Lógoi. Revista De Filosofia, (46), 117 – 130. https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi46.6680