Inés Corujo Martín

doi:10.62876/lr.vi35.4106

Authors

Inés Corujo Martín Hamilton College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi35.4106

Keywords:

Thing theory, Bill Brow, subject, object, materiality, agency, literary and cultural studies

Abstract

Since the 1990s, theoretical and methodological approaches based on the analysis of material objects and on the reconceptualization of materiality have proliferated in cultural and literary studies. Among these perspectives, the school of thought calledthing theory,developed by the American scholar Bill Brown, stands out in "Thing Theory" andA Sense of Things. For Brown, there is a crucial distinction between "object" and "thing" based on Heidegger's phenomenology that allows reaching an ontological correspondence between the subject and the physical world. This article explores the notions that give basis tothing theory, making reference to other theoretical currents within the so-called "material turn" in the humanities of the 21st century. I will examine the scope and limitations of "materialist" interpretations, as well as their analytical productivity in literary and cultural studies, while showing future research paths

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Inés Corujo Martín, Hamilton College

Hamilton College.

Nueva York.

E.E.U.U.

References

Appadurai, Arjun: The Social Life of Things: Commodities in a Cultural Perspective, ed. Arjun Appadurai, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 4.

Baudrillard, Jean: The System of Objects, tr. James Benedict, (New York, Verso, 1996), p. 10.

Benjamin, Walter: The Arcades Project, (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 354.

Bennett, Jane: Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things, (Durham, Duke University Press, 2010), p. 12.

Brooks, Peter: Body Work. Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative, (Cambridge, Harvard University Press), p. 15.

Brown, Bill: “Thing Theory”. En Things, ed. Bill Brown, (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2004).

Brown, Bill: A Sense of Things. The Object Matter of American Literature, (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2003).

Freedgood, Elaine: The Ideas in Things. Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel, (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2006), pp. 2, 4.

Latour, Bruno: We Have Never Been Modern, (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2002), pp. 10-11.

Leuner, Krysten: “‘The end of all the privacy and propriety’: Fanny’s Dressing Room in Mansfield Park”. En Bodies and Things in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture, ed. Katharina Boehm, London, Palgrave MacMillan, 2012, pp. 45-65.

Marx, Karl: Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, tr. Ben Foukes, ed. Ernest Mandel, (New York, Vintage Books, 1977 (1867)), p. 82.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: Phenomenology of Perception, London: Forgotten Books, 2015, p. 215.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: The Visible and the Invisible, Northwestern University Press, 1968, p. 137.

Tilley, Christopher: “Introduction: Theoretical Perspectives”. En Handbook of Material Culture, eds. Cristopher Tilley et al., (London, Sage, 2006), p. 10.

Tilley, Christopher: “Objectification”. En Handbook of Material Culture, eds. Cristopher Tilley et al., London, Sage, 2006, p. 61.