Mary's experiment: defenses and rebuttals around the argument of knowledge

Authors

  • María Daniela Núñez Universidad Central de Venezuela

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi33.3628

Keywords:

experience, conscience, qualia, physicalism

Abstract

In this article, I intend to address different arguments, in favor and against, Frank Jackson’s mental experiment proposed in 1982, known as the knowledge argument or Mary's Room. With this argument, Jackson attempts to support and demonstrate the intrinsic and ineffable nature of phenomenal experience, in addition to the existence and independence of non-physical properties, irreducible to physical language. The validity of the premises of the arguments and their correctness is discussed, contextually.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Daniela Núñez, Universidad Central de Venezuela

Universidad Central de Venezuela.

Instituto de Filosofía.

Caracas. Venezuela.

References

Chalmers, David: La mente consciente. En busca de una teoría fundamental, (Barcelona, Editorial Gedisa, 1a Edic., 1999 (1996)).

Churchland, Paul: A Neurocomputational Perspective.The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science, (The MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1992 (1989)).

Churchland, Paul: Materia y conciencia. Introducción contemporánea a la filosofía de la mente, Traducción Margarita N. Mizrají, (Barcelona, Editorial Gedisa, 2da Edic., 1999 (1984)).

Dennett, Daniel: La conciencia explicada. Una teoría interdisciplinar, Traducción Sergio Balari Ravera, (Barcelona, Ediciones Paidós, 1a Edic., 1995 (1991)).

Flanagan, Owen: Consciousness reconsidered, The MIT Press, (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992).

Jackson, Frank: “Qualia epifenoménicos”, pp. 95-110, Maite Ezcurdia, y Olbeth Hansberg (Eds.), Sensaciones, La naturaleza de la experiencia, Vol.I, (México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2003).

Lewis, David: "Postscript to 'Mad pain and martian pain' " Philosophical Papers, Vol. I, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983).

Nemirow, Lawrence: “reseña de Nagel, T.”, pp. 490-99, Mortal Questions, Philosophical Review, 1980, pp. 475-76. y Nemirow, Lawrence, "Physicalism and the cognitive role of acquaintance", William Lycan, (Ed.), Mind and Cognition, (Basil Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 1990).

Tye, Michael : “Qualia”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Agosto, 1997.

Van Gulick, Robert: “Understanding the Phenomenal Mind: Are We All Just Armadillos? Part I: Phenomenal Knowledge and Explanatory Gaps”, pp. 559-566, Ned Block, Owen Flanagan, y Güven Güzeldere, (Eds.), En The Nature of Consciousness. Philosophical Debates,The MIT press, 1997, p. 559.

Published

2018-06-08

How to Cite

Núñez, M. D. (2018). Mary’s experiment: defenses and rebuttals around the argument of knowledge. Lógoi. Revista De Filosofia, (33), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi33.3628