Determined to be free and responsible? Daniel Dennett's compatibilism

Authors

  • José Rafael Lezama Q. The University of Adelaide

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi039.5026

Keywords:

Determinism, free will, responsability, compatibilism, naturalism

Abstract

This article aims at reviewing Daniel Dennett's approach to free will, as his
position remains in force in the discussion on the subject as a perspective
solidly contrary to extreme models. To this end, we will follow Dennett's route of
criticism of such positions. The result is a compatibilist version of determinism
supported by a robust naturalism that eludes metaphysical commitments
without excluding free will, defined in original terms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Rafael Lezama Q., The University of Adelaide

The University of Adelaide

References

Dennett, Daniel. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Viking.

Dennett, Daniel. 2000. La libertad de acción. Barcelona: Paidós.

Pinker, Steven. 2007. Cómo funciona la mente. Barcelona: Destino.

Ryle, Gilbert. 1967. El concepto de lo mental. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Sagan, Carl. 1980. Cosmos. New York: Random House.

Searle, John. 1990. Mentes, cerebros y ciencia. Madrid: Cátedra.

Symons, John. 2002. On Dennett. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Von Kustchera, Franz. 1989. Fundamentos de ética. Madrid: Cátedra.

Published

2021-06-26

How to Cite

Lezama Q., J. R. (2021). Determined to be free and responsible? Daniel Dennett's compatibilism. Lógoi. Revista De Filosofia, (039), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi039.5026