Construction of an evaluative system of arguments based on the rules proposed by Eduardo Piacenza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.v0i21.2772Keywords:
interagrumentative relations, argument evaluationAbstract
In this paper, we will show the argument-evaluating rules proposed by Eduardo Piacenza when we are confronting conflicting arguments. Also, we will try to construct an evaluative system of arguments based on those rules to determine the scope and possible reformulations of the system.
Downloads
References
Piacenza, Eduardo: “Audiatur et altera pars!”, pp.177-203, (Revista de Derecho 2, Caracas, Tribunal Supremo de Justicia, 2000).
Piacenza, Eduardo: “Las relaciones interargumentales en la evaluación de las argumentaciones judiciales” (ponencia no publicada), VI Congreso Nacional de Filosofía, (Universidad Católica “Andrés Bello” - Núcleo Guayana, 27-30 de septiembre, 2005).
Pollock, John: Defeasible Reasoning with Variable Degrees of Justification II, 2002. Versión corregida en Internet, accesible en http: oscarhome.soc-sci.arizona.edu/ftp/papers/Degrees.pdf [Consulta: 12 de octubre de 2012]
Searle, John: Actos de habla, tr. Luis M. Valdés Villanueva, (Madrid, Cátedra, 1980).
Van Eemeren, Frans et al.: Fundamentals of argumentation theory: backgrounds and contemporary developments, (New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Array
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
