Parallel lives: arguments and inferences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi038.6468Keywords:
arguments, inference, implication, persuasion, reasonsAbstract
When discussing argumentation from a logical point of view, such terms as "argument," "inference," "reasoning," "reasons," and even "implication" are often confused. Their definitions are usually approximate, and that often leads to woolly discussions. My first purpose is to clarify these concepts and their mutual relationships. My second purpose is to determine the relevance of the notion of logical inference for the analysis of arguments. I will argue that if the logical question par excellence is "should the conclusion be accepted for the reasons given to support it?", its relevance is scarce.
Downloads
References
Analisa Coliva: The Varieties of Self- Knowledge. Londres, Palgrave-McMillan, 2016, cap. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-32613-3
Douglas N. Walton, C. Reed, y F. Macagno: Argumentation schemes. Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 9, mi traducción. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034
Douglas N. Walton: “Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments”, Informal Logic ,Vol. 21 (2), pp. 141-169, 2001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v21i2.2241
Hugo Mercier y Dan Sperber: “Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, nº 2, pp.
Hugo Mercier y Dan Sperber: “Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, nº 2, pp. 57-74, 2011, p. 60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968
Igor Douven: "Abduction", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (edición de verano de 2017), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), (2017) URL https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/abduction/
J.A. Blair, ed.: “The Possibility and Actuality of Visual Arguments”, en Groundwork in the theory of argumentation, pp 205–224, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, Londres, Nueva York, Springer, 2012, p. 216, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_16
Jean-Michel Adam y Marc Bonhomme: La argumentación publicitaria. Madrid, Cátedra, 2000, p. 94.
José Lázaro, “La doble lógica del lenguaje en la teoría freudiana”, ponencia presentada en el Congreso Internacional Categorías e inteligibilidad global, 19-23 de abril de 1993.
José Miguel Sagüillo: “Consecuencia”, en L. Vega y P. Olmos, eds., Compendio de lógica, argumentación y retórica, Madrid, Trotta, pp.120-127. 2011, p 121.
Joseph Wenzel: “Three Perspectives on Argument. Rhetoric, Dialectic, Logic”, en Trapp, R. y Schuetz, J.H., eds., Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede, pp. 9-26. Nueva York, Idebate Pres., 2006, p. 17.
Joseph Wenzel: “Three Perspectives on Argument. Rhetoric, Dialectic, Logic”, pp. 9-26, en Trapp, R. y Schuetz, J.H., eds., Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede,. Nueva York, Idebate Pres., 2006, p. 17
Kent Bach y Robert M Harnish: Linguistic Communication and Speech-acts, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1979, p. 41.
La Tribuna de Salamanca: “'Stop Uranio' se concentra este 19 de agosto contra la mina de Berkeley”. La Tribuna de Salamanca. Noticia, 19/08/2017, Consultado en: https://www.tribunasalamanca.com/noticias/stop-uranio-se-concentra-este-19-de-agosto-contra-la-mina-de-berkeley/1503131813
La Vanguardia, “Exigen la legalización del topless en Río de Janeiro”. La Vanguardia 21/12/2013. Consultado en: http://www.lavanguardia.com/vida/20131221/54397439704/exigen-legalizacion-topless-rio-de-janeiro.html.
Lilian Bermejo-Luque: Giving Reasons. A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, Londres y Nueva York, Springer.,2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9
Luis Vega Reñón: “Inferencia”, pp. 297-301, en L. Vega y P. Olmos, eds., Compendio de lógica, argumentación y retórica, Madrid, Trotta, 2011, pp. 298-300.
Petros Márkaris: Noticias de la noche, Madrid, Tusquets, 2017, p. 42.
Ralp H Johnson: Manifest Rationaliy. A Pragmatic theory of Argument, Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000, pp. 39-40.
Robert Asen: “Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere”, Informal Logic 25(2): 117-137. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v25i2.1115
Rosa M. Tristán: “La minera Berkeley quiere abrir otras dos minas de uranio en Salamanca” en El HuffPost, Noticias, 28/05/2017. Consultado en: https://www.huffingtonpost.es/2017/05/26/la-minera-berkeley-quiere-abrir-otras-dos-minas-de-uranio-en-sal_a_22107582/
Trudy Govier: “Critical Thinking as Argument Analysis?", Argumentation, III, pp. 115-126, 1989, p117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128143
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Hubert Marraud
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
