Critical evaluation of Bas van Fraassen's objections to the EMI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.v0i27.3238Keywords:
van Fraassen, scientific Realism and Antirealism , Inference towards the best explanation, self-evident assumptionsAbstract
In considering the merits of the so-called 'Inference to the Best Explanation' (IME), especially in the framework of the Realism-Antirrealism Scientific debate, the objective of this paper is to reconstruct van Fraassen's main objections to the EMI in order to evaluate them and explain those relevant assumptions that are implicit in their arguments. Thus we will arrive at the idea that these are not self-evident assumptions, so they must be demonstrated, otherwise, many of the arguments presented here are inconclusive.
Downloads
References
Lipton, Peter: Inference to the Best Explanation, (London, Routledge, 1991).
Okasha, Samir: Van Fraassen’s Critique of Inference to the Best Explanation, (Great Britain, Elsevier Science Ltd.,2000).
Putnam, Hillary: Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1975).
Sanders Peirce, Charles: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Editado por C. Harstshorne, P. Weiss y A. Burks, 1958).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Array
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
