Artificial Intelligence and the Principle of Simplicity in Labor Procedural Law

Authors

Keywords:

Artificial, Intelligence, Labor, Law

Abstract

The Principle of Simplicity is based on a search for simplification in the labor process and legislation with the aim of achieving maximum efficiency in the process and effectiveness of the Right of Access to Justice. Artificial Intelligence can contribute positively to the Principle of Simplicity, mainly by assisting court officials in routine tasks and in the search for judicial precedents. The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice proposes several recommended uses for Artificial Intelligence, such as search engines for jurisprudence with machine learning techniques and chatbots to facilitate access to legal knowledge. However, there is an ethical problem when using Artificial Intelligence in decision-making, as it can reproduce the biases of its creators. In addition, the implementation of Artificial Intelligence could exclude a large part of the population that does not have access to quality internet. In Brazil, an Artificial Intelligence software was launched to answer labor inquiries from any user in Brazil who wants to do so through an online chat, but this act raised many questions about whether labor rights and possible biases in the provided answers are being adequately considered by the AI. The implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the legal field can be of great help to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system, considering at all times the possible ethical problems that may arise.

Contacto de autores

Correo electrónico: abg.isabellazamora@gmail.com nervisgarcia@gmail.com

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

● AAAI. (2023). AAAI Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. (PUBLICACION ELIMINADA).

● Cepeda, M. J., y Otálora, G. (2020). Modernización de la administración de justicia a través de la inteligencia artificial, FEDEDESARROLLO Centro de Investigación Económica y Social, 1-68. Recuperado de: https://www.repository.fedesarrollo.org.co/bitstream/handle/11445/3980/Repor_Julio_2020_Cepeda_y_Ot%C3%A1lora.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

● Corvalán, J. G., y Palumbo, J. (2019). Inteligencia Artificial y Trabajo. Explorando un nuevo paradigma laboral. Diario DPI, (210), 2-5. Recuperado de:https://dpicuantico.com/sitio/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Doctrina-Corval%C3%A1n-y-Palumbo-11-07-1.pdf

● Data Scientest. (2022). Inteligencia artificial: definición, historia, usos, peligros. DataScientest.com. Recuperado de: https://datascientest.com/es/inteligencia-artificial-definicion

● Monteiro, R. (2019). Abogacía laboral 4.0: Inteligencia artificial y problemáticas profesionales en la abogacía brasileña. Revista chilena derecho y tecnología. .8(1) Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2019.51276

● Ramírez, L. (2023). 16 aplicaciones de inteligencia artificial que tu empresa necesita. IEBS. Recuperado de: https://www.iebschool.com/blog/herramientas-aplicaciones-inteligencia-artificial-big-data/

● Ransbotham, S. (2021). The Cultural Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in the Enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review. Recuperado de: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/the-cultural-benefits-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-enterprise/

● Rivero, D. A. (2007). Oportunidad para promover pruebas en el proceso laboral venezolano. (Tesis de postgrado) Recuperado de: http://biblioteca2.ucab.edu.ve/anexos/biblioteca/marc/texto/AAQ9838.pdf

● Russell, S., y Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall. Recuperado de: https://people.engr.tamu.edu/guni/csce421/files/AI_Russell_Norvig.pdf

● Samacá, A. F. (2016). Inteligencia Artificial Aplicada al Derecho. (Tesis de Grado). Recuperado de: https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11634/9376/Samacaandres2016.pdf?sequence=1

● Soba, I. M. (2022). EL DERECHO PROCESAL, SUS FUENTES Y EL DESAFÍO DE LA SIMPLICIDAD. Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual – REDP., 23(2), 564-591. Recuperado de: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/viewFile/67823/42358

● Trueba, A. (1965). Tratado teórico práctico de derecho procesal del trabajo. Revista Colaboraciones Jurídicas, (58), 1-6. Recuperado de: https://revistas-colaboracion.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/rev-facultad-derecho-mx/article/view/26205

Published

2023-12-09

How to Cite

Zamora, I. ., & García, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Principle of Simplicity in Labor Procedural Law. Guayana Moderna, 12(12), 419–430. Retrieved from https://revistasenlinea.saber.ucab.edu.ve/index.php/guayanamoderna/article/view/6402