Digital Aesthetics and Identities: Cyberspace as a Device of Visibility and New Media as an Agent Reconfiguring Sensibility.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi49.7964

Keywords:

Ciberespacio, estéticas digitales, heterotopía, identidades digitales, new media, religiosidad personal, sensibilidad

Abstract

This work addresses the emergence of Digital Aesthetics and Identities by examining cyberspace as a device of visibility that reconfigures sensible experience. It is argued that the World Wide Web (WWW) functions as a Foucauldian heterotopia, a hybrid and ubiquitous space that transforms the subject's relationship with material reality and time. Operating under the logic of total connectivity, this digital environment generates a profound existential anxiety (inquietud existencial), channeled into a personal and aesthetic religiosity that seeks meaning outside traditional institutions (Fraijó, Panikkar). Consequently, New Media consolidates itself as the semiotic agent that gives form to this crisis. By performing the rematerialization of data and fostering the material/virtual question (where the essence of being resides), digital art becomes the active manifestation of a new search for spirituality. It is concluded that digital aesthetics reflect a continuous process of resignification of being in the era of data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andrés Ricardo Aguiar Alarcón, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello / Venezuela

Curador adjunto, GBG ARTS.  Lic. en Filosofía (tesista), UCAB. Instagram: @anri.rtf. Entre sus áreas de investigación actuales se encuentran: El arte contemporáneo y los nuevos medios; la metapintura en el ciberespacio; la filosofía de la imagen a partir de los trabajos de Rancière y Foucault; las conexiones entre la moda, la identidad, la representación visual y la política

References

Foucault, Michel. ‘Des espaces autres’. Foucault Info (1967). https://foucault.info/documents/heterotopia/foucault.heteroTopia.en/.

Fraijó, Manuel. ‘¿Religión sin Dios?’. Isegoría, no. 47 (2012): 381–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2012.047.01

Grieve, Gregory. ‘Imagining a virtual religious community: Neo-pagans on the internet’. Chicago Anthropology Exchange 7, no. 1 (1995): 98–132. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/G_Grieve_Imagining_1995.pdf.

Marina, José Antonio. Dictamen sobre Dios. (Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama, 2002).

Panikkar, Raimon. ‘La religión del futuro’. En Filosofía de la religión, editado por Manuel Fraijó. (Madrid: Editorial Trotta, 1994): 733–753.

Ríos, D. ‘Nuevas materialidades en la Era Digital, narradas a través de experimentos sonoros’. Anti-Materia (2019). https://anti-materia.org/nuevas-materialidades-texto.

Pantone, Felipe. ‘Manifiesto ultradinámico’. (2013). https://www.mtn-world.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/ultradynamism_graffiti_pant_dems_montana_colors_mtn_2.jpg.

Rancière, Jacques. El reparto de lo sensible: Estética y política. (Santiago: Ediciones LOM, 2009).

Si-Qin, Timur. ‘Metamaterialism’. Pooool (2011). https://pooool.info/p_461/.

Torres Castellanos, A. ‘Reseña de La religión sin Dios, de Ronald Dworkin’. Problema: Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho, no. 8 (2014): 521–539.

Published

2026-01-13

How to Cite

Aguiar Alarcón, A. R. (2026). Digital Aesthetics and Identities: Cyberspace as a Device of Visibility and New Media as an Agent Reconfiguring Sensibility. Lógoi. Revista De Filosofia, (49), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.62876/lr.vi49.7964

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.