Digital twins:

artificial intelligence and mixed reality in vulnerable communities

Authors

  • Luís Esis Universidad Metropolitana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62876/tc.vi52.8235

Keywords:

Digital twins, artificial intelligence, mixed reality, socio-environmental anticipation, vulnerable communities

Abstract

The intensification of climatic, social, and territorial risks has exposed the limitations of traditional planning approaches, particularly in vulnerable communities characterized by institutional fragility and limited anticipatory capacity. In this context, this article critically examines the convergence of digital twins, artificial intelligence, and mixed reality as an emerging sociotechnical architecture with the potential to strengthen socio-environmental anticipation and sustainable planning processes. The study aims to analyze the scope and limitations of these technologies from a communicational, ethical, and interdisciplinary perspective oriented toward sustainable development. Methodologically, the research adopts a qualitative, theoretical–documentary, and interpretive approach, based on the critical review and analysis of specialized literature and relevant institutional documents. The findings suggest that digital twins integrated with artificial intelligence and mixed reality can enhance decision-making through scenario simulation, immersive visibility, and the translation of complex data into intelligible representations for diverse stakeholders; however, their social value depends on human-centered design, ethical data governance, and meaningful community participation. The main contribution of the study is to propose an interpretive framework that conceptualizes digital twins not only as technical infrastructures but also as communicational and political devices, emphasizing that their contribution to sustainability and vulnerability reduction is contingent upon principles of algorithmic justice, transparency, and equity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luís Esis, Universidad Metropolitana

Doctorando en Ciencias de las Comunicaciones de la Sociedad del Conocimiento de la Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (UCAB). Máster Universitario en Comunicación Organizacional de la Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (UCAB). Especialista de Responsabilidad Social y Empresarial de la Universidad Metropolitana (UNIMET). Consultor y experto en comunicaciones corporativas, gestión de crisis, asuntos públicos, marca personal y desarrollo de programas de impacto social, económico y ambiental, con más de 10 años de experiencia en el sector privado de Venezuela, Colombia, Chile, Guatemala, México y Brasil.

References

Berganza M. R., y Ruiz San Román, J. A. (2005). Investigar en comunicación: Guía práctica de métodos y técnicas de investigación social en comunicación. McGraw-Hill.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.

Flick, U. (2015). Introducing research methodology: A beginner’s guide to doing a research project (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Floridi, L. (2022). The ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press.

Grieves, M., y Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. (pp. 85–113). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4

Harvey, P. (2017). El diseño comunáutico: Fundamentos para una teoría del vínculo social en los entornos digitales. Université du Québec.

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., y Baptista-Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6a ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Inter-American Development Bank. (2019). Emerging technologies for resilience and disaster risk management. BID.

Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., y Hicks, B. (2020). Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002

Ketzler, B., Löchner, G., Neugebauer, C. S., Ritthoff, M., y Voss, A. (2023). Digital twins for sustainability assessment and decision-making. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13369

Milgram, P., y Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D (12), 1321–1329.

Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Éditions du Seuil.

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.

OECD. (2023). Artificial intelligence in society: Sustainability and governance. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

ONU. (2023). Informe de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible 2023. Organización de las Naciones Unidas.

Pasquale, F. (2020). New laws of robotics: Defending human expertise in the age of AI. Harvard University Press.

Tao, F., Qi, Q., Liu, A., y Kusiak, A. (2019). Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006

United Nations Development Program. (2021). Technology for development: Digital tools for climate resilience. https://www.undp.org/publications/technology-development-digital-tools-climate-resilience

Virtual Singapore. (2020). Virtual Singapore: A dynamic 3D city model and collaborative platform. Singapore Land Authority. https://www.sla.gov.sg

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Esis, L. (2026). Digital twins:: artificial intelligence and mixed reality in vulnerable communities. Temas De Comunicación., (52), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.62876/tc.vi52.8235

Issue

Section

Artí­culos - Dossier Central