Aspectos fundamentales de los sistemas de representación de los trabajadores en la junta directiva

  • Teodoro Campos UCAB
Palabras clave: cogestión, gobierno corporativo, representación, Junta Directiva, codetermination, corporate governance, board-level workers' representation


Partiendo de los hallazgos obtenidos por Jackson (2005), en este ensayo se define la cogestión en términos de la representación de los trabajadores en la junta directiva, se describen las características de la cogestión en 22 países de la OECD, y se describen los patrones transnacionales de cogestión basados en la gobernanza corporativa, las relaciones laborales, los sistemas políticos y el marco legal. Con este ensayo se espera contribuir al debate contemporáneo acerca de la representación de los trabajadores en el gobierno corporativo.


Based on the findings obtained by Jackson (2005), codetermination is defined in this paper in terms of coworker representation on the board, features of codetermination in 22 OECD countries are described, and transnational patterns of codetermination are also described based on corporate governance, labor relations, the political system and the legal system. It is expected to contribute to the contemporary debate on the representation of employees in corporate governance.

Biografía del autor/a

Teodoro Campos, UCAB

Doctor en Desarrollo de Recursos Humanos (George Washington University) y profesor de la Universidad Católica Andrés Bello y de la Universidad Central de Venezuela.


Aguilera, R.V. y Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 12, 1-19.

Botero, J.C., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. y Shleifer, A. (2004). The regulation of labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 1339–1382.

Clegg, H.A. (1976). Trade unions under collective bargaining. Oxford.: Blackwell.

Crouch, C. (1993). Industrial relations and European State traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Donnelly, S., Gamble, A., Jackson, G., y Parkinson, J. (2001). The public interest and the company in Britain and Germany. London: Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society.

Fligstein, N. y Shin, T. (2007). Shareholder value and the transformation of the U.S. economy. Sociological Forum, 22, 4.

Goetschy, J. (1983). A new future for industrial democracy in France? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1, 85-100.

Gospel, H. y Pendleton, A. (eds) (2005). Corporate governance and labour management: An international comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gourevitch, P.A. (2003). The politics of corporate regulation. The Yale Law Journal, 112, 101-152.

Goyer, M. (2001). Corporate governance and the innovation system in France. Industry and Innovation, 8 (2), 135-158.

Hans-Boeckler Foundation y European Trade Union Institute (2004). Workers representation at the board-level in the EU-15 Countries. Reports on national systems and practices, Brussels.

Höpner, M. (2005). What connects industrial relations and corporate governance? Explaining institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review, 3, 331-358.

Jackson, G. (2001). Organizing the firm: Corporate governance in Germany and Japan. 1870—2000. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University.

Jackson, G. (2005). Employee representation in the board compared : A fuzzy sets analysis of corporate governance, unionism and political institutions. Industrielle Beziehungen, 12, 252-279.

Jackson, G. y Aguilera, R. (2010) Comparative and international corporate governance. The Academy of Management Annals, 4 (1), 485-556.

Jackson, G., Hoepner, M. y Kurdelbusch, A. (2004). Corporate governance and employees in Germany: Changing linkages, complementarities, and tensions. RIETI Discussion Paper No. 04-E-008.

Knudsen, H. (2004). European work councils: Potential and obstacles on the road to employee influence in multinational companies. Industrielle Beziehungen, 11 (3), 203-220.

Levinson, K. (2000). Codetermination in Sweden: Myth and reality. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 21, 457-474.

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press..

Pagano, M. y Volpin, P. (2004). Managers, workers, and corporate control. Journal of Finance, 60, 2, 841-868.

Pagano, M. y Volpin, P. (2005). The political economy of corporate governance. American Economic Review, 95, 4, 1005-1030.

Roe, M.J. (2008). The inevitable instability of American corporate governance. SSRN Working Paper Series.

Roe, M.J. (2011). German Codetermination and German securities markets. SSRN Working Paper Series.

Shleifer, A. y Summers, L.H. (1988). Breach of trust in hostile takeovers. In Alan Auerbach (Ed.): Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences. Chicago, IL: University of Chigago Press, 33-68.

Streeck, W. (2009). Industrial relations today: reigning in flexibility. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 4 (3) , 15-36.

van het Kaar, R.H. (2004). The Dutch system of enterprise level workers' participation. Country Report, SEE Europe.

Vernon, G. (2006). Does density matter? The significance of comparative hstorical variation in unionization. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 188-209.

Vitols, S. (2004). Negotiated shareholder value: The German version of an Anglo-American practice. Competition and Change, 8, 1-18.