TY - JOUR AU - Lauriño, Luis PY - 2013/05/29 Y2 - 2024/03/28 TI - Rómulo Betancourt y las relaciones sociales de trabajo. Confrontación del marco teórico aprendido con el deducido de la realidad socio-política JF - Revista sobre Relaciones Industriales y Laborales JA - RRII VL - 0 IS - 47 SE - Comunicaciones DO - UR - https://revistasenlinea.saber.ucab.edu.ve/index.php/rrii2/article/view/895 SP - AB - <p>Una aproximaci&oacute;n desprevenida al pensamiento y obra de R&oacute;mulo Betancourt en torno a las relaciones sociales de trabajo podr&iacute;a conducirnos a un v&iacute;nculo entre el partido pol&iacute;tico (en este caso, Acci&oacute;n Democr&aacute;tica) y los Sindicatos, impulsado o promovido por el mencionado actor pol&iacute;tico. Sin embargo, una mirada sosegada permite plantear dicho pensamiento y obra como factores determinantes del desarrollo organizativo y evoluci&oacute;n democr&aacute;tica de los actores de las relaciones sociales de trabajo, as&iacute; como del impulso a un contexto industrial que fungir&iacute;a como la base fundamental&nbsp; y condicionante de lo anterior.</p> <p>Dicho esto, y con la intenci&oacute;n de aproximarnos al planteamiento previamente expresado se consideraron cuatro aspectos fundamentales como punto de partida de una investigaci&oacute;n orientada a su demostraci&oacute;n cient&iacute;fica. A saber: los fundamentos, los criterios, la estrategia y t&aacute;ctica, as&iacute; como la comunicaci&oacute;n de los resultados.</p> <p>Cuando hablo de los fundamentos, me refiero a la percepci&oacute;n historicista de la realidad socio-hist&oacute;rica, no te&oacute;rica que debi&oacute; hacerse R&oacute;mulo Betancourt a partir de una realidad con la que debi&oacute; interactuar (espacio-tiempo). A su vez, los criterios se han planteado para entender la aplicaci&oacute;n cr&iacute;tica del marxismo humanista, apreciado en sus fuentes. En cuanto la estrategia y t&aacute;ctica, la intenci&oacute;n fue estudiar la confrontaci&oacute;n cr&iacute;tica del leninismo (como teor&iacute;a del poder) con la realidad hist&oacute;ricamente percibida y pol&iacute;ticamente confrontada. Por &uacute;ltimo, la comunicaci&oacute;n de resultados se refiere a la posibilidad de enunciar pistas y hallazgos que conducir&aacute;n, en el marco de una investigaci&oacute;n, a plantear, ya no como una comunicaci&oacute;n, sino como una hip&oacute;tesis cient&iacute;fica, la presunci&oacute;n de que el pensamiento y obra de R&oacute;mulo Betancourt fueron factores determinantes en el desarrollo organizativo y la evoluci&oacute;n democr&aacute;tica de los actores de las relaciones sociales de trabajo en Venezuela.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>An unplanned approach to the thought and work of R&oacute;mulo Betancourt around the social relations of work could lead to a link between the political party (in this case, Acci&oacute;n Democr&aacute;tica) and unions promoted by the forementioned political actor. However, a calm look of the thought and work of Betancourt allows understanding his ideas as determinant factors of the organizational development and the democratic evolution of the actors in the social relations of work as well as the drive towards the development of an industrial context that would serve as the foundation and condition to the above.</p> <p>That said, and with the intention to approach the proposed analysis, four key aspects are considered here as a starting point for an investigation leading to its scientific demonstration. Namely: the foundations, the criteria, strategy and tactics, and communication of results.</p> <p>When I talk about the foundations, I mean the historicist perception of the socio-historical reality and not theoretical that Romulo Betancourt developed from a reality with which he would have to interact (space-time). In turn, the criteria have been proposed to understand the critical application of humanist Marxism that can be appreciated from his sources. In terms of the strategy and tactic, the intention was to study the critical confrontation of Leninism (as a theory of power) with both the historically perceived reality and the politically confronted reality. Finally, communication of results refers to the possibility of stating clues and finds that will lead, within the framework of an investigation, to raise, as a scientific hypothesis, the assumption that the thought and work of Romulo Betancourt were determining factors of the organizational development and the democratic evolution of the actors in the social relations of work in Venezuela.</p><p>&nbsp;</p> ER -